Sunday, 19 November 2017
Kampung Compass Points Letters We don't take such money
We don't take such money PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 18 May 2010 00:20
png-goh

Goh Keat Peng: Addressing the audience at the Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia Roadshow in Penang.

By Goh Keat Peng

First published in onGOHing.wordpress.com


Regardless of the results of the Sibu parliamentary by-elections, the reported “special grants” of RM1.75 million to four Methodist churches on the eve of polling day is very troubling to me as a Christian who attends a Methodist church and I am sure to many other Christians.


It is always troubling when a sitting government, regardless of which party, has to resort to dishing out “special grants” to various sections of the constituency involved in an election for the sole purpose of increasing their votability.


Such last-minute attempts to be seen as being sympathetic to the concerns and needs of specific sectors of voters is dishonest, insincere and hypocritical.


A sitting government which is genuinely sincere would have had a system in place to gauge issues and needs of the respective voters and to have an orderly, transparent, fair and effective way of allocating adequate budget and plans to resolve problems on the ground.


It is difficult to see how large sums of public money could suddenly become available or that the people’s needs could suddenly catch the eyes of the powers that be only when election campaigns are on.

 


The issues, needs and concerns faced by religious communities, Muslim as well as non-Muslim, are there for all to see. If sincerely, fairly and properly dealt with, they would not become election issues.


Likewise, issues facing particular ethnic communities or perennial problems and threats such as floods, road conditions, etc. Therefore, last minute “election goodies” and “special grants” are tacit admissions of lack of proper and honest planning and implementation on the part of a sitting government.


Apart from all this, the matter of offering “special grants” to the four Methodist churches in Sibu on the eve of polling day is especially troubling to me on account of the fact that I am a Christian and a member of the Methodist Church, a denomination which among other things have served the people of this country well before its independence in various social fields including education and especially the education of women one of whom was my own mother.


I was saddened and very concerned about comments that were made regarding these “special grants” by concerned citizens who not only care about Sibu and Malaysia but also about the possibility of how this blatantly desperate episode could also affect the churches’ good name.


Here are a few samples of such comments:


Jin Chuah: The worry part is RM1.75 million of Federal allocation has channelled into 4 Methodist churches in Sibu resulting those Christians who yet to cast their votes may not turn up.


Tan: god is watching SIBU”, but he is helpless with BN’s goodies.


Abang Adek: Like I said last night, God is nothing compared to money. And the Methodist Churches who took the bribes from the BN only prove again to all, that God is nothing compared to money. You PR guys only hope in miracles. Well, the miracle happening today is the miracle of $$$. Money talks, Money walks…


Fairplay Lee: All Christian brothers and sisters do not be cheated and wake up and vote for justice and be guided by the holy spirit.


Disappointed: the RM1.75 million Federal Fund channelled to 4 churches is not BN pocket money but rightfully the rakyat’s money. Dont u think the money comes a bit too late. Think Sibuan b4 casting yr votes.


Aca: santa… gives millions to churches and only RM600 per head to poor Ibans. Next round maybe Ibans get RM6,000 per head and RM600 per church. Wonder whether the pastors can be corrupted by the millions?


Kumar: Pg: Dengan rasuah sebanyak RM1.75m, adakah orang kristian akan meyerahkan maruah ugama mereka kepada UMNO?


Anil: If you ask me, I don’t think the churches in Sibu should have accepted those grants during the election campaign period -even if their followers can still vote as they please. After all, this is vote-buying and both the buyer and the recipient need to be responsible (though one can understand the circumstances of those who desperately need the money). But I don’t think the churches are in such desperation. They are called to uphold a higher standard and should set an example to others by rejecting corruption in all its forms. It would also be a telling lesson to those who offer them the money - that there are some things that money just cannot buy.


The spot light rightly or wrongly is therefore very much on the Christian Church in Malaysia regardless of denomination or communion.


Malaysians are watching us and wondering aloud or silently, waiting to see what we will do under these circumstances, waiting for a clear word from us.


This happened in Sibu but its ramifications will be much wider in scope and depth. It is not even just to do with the Christian community as such but how elections are conducted in the country and how we conduct ourselves during elections and at other times.


I respectfully appeal to the churches directly involved in this episode:


If it isn’t true and it didn’t happen, then please say so.


If it is true, offered and received, give it all back.


WE DON’T WANT SUCH MONEY.


Let the church be poor (as a church mouse) but as the Book of Proverbs say, poor but happy keeping a clear conscience.


I also respectfully appeal to all Malaysian churches through the Christian Federation of Malaysia:


Please let us send a clear, unmistakeable and irrevocable message to the country and the world. As citizens and tax-payers we deserve to practise and observe our religious faith in peaceful and orderly fashion and we should get reasonable amounts of resources to enable us to do so.


Any sitting government is welcome to sit down with us, discuss and understand in a timely and civil way our religion and our community’s needs and concerns regarding places of worship, burial grounds and our bibles in Bahasa Malaysia as well as how we will continue to serve all Malaysians in need through our social services.


Provide the facilities and resources justly due to us but please don’t give us “special grants” only at the eve of by-elections. WE DON’T TAKE SUCH MONEY. No, thank you.


Never under such circumstances.


Otherwise, we will be sending the message to the government, present or future, BN or PR, that the church which bears the name of Christ is ever willing to take money under such circumstances:


“Make us an offer, we are open to such funding. We encourage electioneering where money is utilised as a means to win votes. Is there a higher bid?”


The Christian Church preaches moral values and standards in all things to all people. It wants to take the moral high ground. It must therefore be subjected to the same high moral standards which it espouses.


We serve a risen saviour whose birth in human form was in a humble manger because there was no room in the inn for his parents.


Let us stay true to our calling.

Comments
Search RSS
Only registered users can write comments!
Not-so-wise-guy |2010-05-18 14:17:27
I am a Christian, and I am dissapointed with the obvious vote-fishing grant given to the Church of which is the largest denomination in Sibu.
Well, technically, the grant is still not a bribe (which may be otherwise in reality). So, we can work this out as the recipient.
There's a rule in corruption: I take your money and I abuse my authority according to your will.
Correct me if I am wrong, but such grant would have been given out as some kind of "social grant", such as those given to the old folks home. The "cheerful giver" cannot label it as bribe in black-and-white (who would do that?).
Therefore, since technically it's not a bribe in black-and-white, so technically the recipient are not obliged to exercise their rights according to the giver's will.
I say, just take the money (as "God's blessing via the social concern of the authority"
;)

;)

, and vote without being influenced by the grant. If the poorer groups need the money, then just channel the grant to those people.
God bless the voters who walked His will.
shakoo  - Pooh to you devil! |2010-05-21 12:51:24
:evil:

:evil:

In this instance, I'd readily say...take the money,if that is the only way to slight a sly devil...in this case the sitting government...play the same game. You give, I take.

But with this difference....use the money to slight this very hand that gave it and teach it morality by using it for a good purpose, for example, making use of it to start whatever is essential for the poor, ie poor of any race...show this sitting government that other benign people can start to do what it never had any intentions of doing in the first place, but had given the money just to win votes.

For example use the money all 1.75-million to start some small educational enterprise in Sibu where the poor and needy would benefit and show and publicize all over Malaysia that this elections' vote seeking money has been put to good use, not by the government, but by some Christian denomination, ie the Methodist Church.

There are ways to tell the truth and shame the devil.

Anil, this way,is a good enough moral ground...helping all poor, from money derived from the coffers of the rich.Don't give it back,after having received it.
Wally Yap  - Angry |2010-05-23 01:17:32
:angry:

:angry:



It would be shameful if the churches had accepted the grant.It is obviously a form of bribe.By accepting the grant,the church will undo all that Christianity and the church stands for.Tainted money should not be used for any form of improvement to the churches.No matter how much the churches need the money,if the churches accept it,they are no better than the giver - evil and corrupt.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 00:51
 

Your are currently browsing this site with Internet Explorer 6 (IE6).

Your current web browser must be updated to version 7 of Internet Explorer (IE7) to take advantage of all of template's capabilities.

Why should I upgrade to Internet Explorer 7? Microsoft has redesigned Internet Explorer from the ground up, with better security, new capabilities, and a whole new interface. Many changes resulted from the feedback of millions of users who tested prerelease versions of the new browser. The most compelling reason to upgrade is the improved security. The Internet of today is not the Internet of five years ago. There are dangers that simply didn't exist back in 2001, when Internet Explorer 6 was released to the world. Internet Explorer 7 makes surfing the web fundamentally safer by offering greater protection against viruses, spyware, and other online risks.

Get free downloads for Internet Explorer 7, including recommended updates as they become available. To download Internet Explorer 7 in the language of your choice, please visit the Internet Explorer 7 worldwide page.